The astrometric accuracy is measured in two different ways.
The astrometric calibration of the Wide survey is described in Section 3.5.
The mean internal astrometric calibration errors are derived using the cross-identifications of sources inside the overlapping regions of adjacent fields (see Fig. 21). All single input MegaCam Wide, Pre-Wide (see Fig. 21) and short photometric exposures images remaining after selection are included. The cross-identifications and the internal errors are obtained during the SCAMP calibration process. The calibrations outputs of the Wide fields W1, W2, W3 and W4 are available from the synoptic table.
Over the whole survey, the mean internal rms error is
| (16) |
where the reported errors are not the SCAMP internal errors, but the mean absolute difference of the internal errors between the four Wide fields and the mean error values. Since the four fields are calibrated independently, the errors quoted above are approximate; the internal errors for W1, W2, W3 and W4 are given in Table ??.
For each field, the mean rms external RA and DEC errors of the astrometric solution are derived during the SCAMP calibration process, using the cross-identification of sources inside each single CFHTLS Wide image with the 2MASS catalogue. The mean external calibration errors over the whole survey are σRA = 0.239” and σDEC = 0.232”. They roughly correspond to the internal errors of the 2MASS catalogue.
The mean scatter from one Wide field to another is uncertain, because the CFHTLS is made of only four independent fields. It can be estimated from the offsets of the mean external errors of each field separately with respect to the mean value over the four fields. The offsets are listed in Table 12. The amplitudes are very close to the internal astrometric calibration errors of the Wide fields, hence we conclude that the internal astrometric accuracy for the CFHTLS Wide does not have significant field-to-field scatter.
|
The astrometric accuracy inside each stack is measured by comparing the source positions in the final CFHTLS catalogues produced from all stacks with the 2MASS source catalogue. The results are given in the QualityFITS-out (QFITS-out) evaluation web pages. The mean external astrometric errors inside each stack are given by the rms of the the positions of each source inside a stack with respect to an external reference catalogue (2MASS). The results are listed in Table 13. They are in excellent agreement with the external errors from the internal astrometric calibration.
To control whether systematic offsets of source coordinates are present inside each Wide catalogue, we inspected and averaged over all stacks composing each Wide field the mean offsets ⟨ΔRACFHTLS-2MASS⟩ and ⟨ΔDECCFHTLS-2MASS⟩, between the the CFHTLS and 2MASS positions inside a stack. The significance of the offsets is given by comparing the rms of the average of the mean offset value with the rms of the mean external errors, averaged over the number of field per Wide tile (72 for W1, 25 for W2, 49 for W3 and 25 for W4). The results are listed in Table 13 and detailed in Fig. 39, 40, 41, and 42, for the four Wide patches, globally and as a function of filter. All fields with the exception of W1 show small offsets. They are perceptible in both amplitude and direction and in all filters, but vary from a Wide tile to another. The amplitude is nevertheless small (about 1/10 of the CFHTLS pixel size) and never larger than the 1-σ rms offset error, the 1-σ rms error of the external error or the mean internal astrometric errors of the Wide astrometric calibration. Furthermore, we do not see significant chromatic effects.
Figures 39 to 42 also show only a few outliers stacks with large astrometric offsets with respect to the 2MASS source positions. The most extreme fields are listed in the next sections. However, the number of outliers with an amplitude of the deviation of more than 3-σ deviations in at least one direction is close to Gaussian expectations (9/360 for W1, 1/245 for W3, 0/125 for W2 and W4).
|
|
|
|